From heede at climatemitigation.com Thu Nov 1 10:29:12 2007 From: heede at climatemitigation.com (Rick Heede) Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 08:29:12 -0600 Subject: [GHG Network] Aircraft Jet Kerosene emissions factors In-Reply-To: <20071031110540.7FC11C1823F@milkyway.forumone.com> Message-ID: I don't have a wells-to-turbine emissions analysis for kerosene at hand, but I doubt that 12.2 percent (3.567 / 3.18) adder to combustion is likely to account for the full extent of CO2 and CH4 emissions of oil production, field energy use, transport, refining, and delivery of Jet-A fuel. If anyone has a supply chain emissions estimate for kerosene, let us know. Cheers, -Rick-= On 10/31/07 5:05 AM, "Marc Aristegui" wrote: > I agree with Keith and Duncan. > > 0.853 is carbon equivalent per ton of kerosene > 0.853 * 44/12 = 3.18 is carbon dioxide equivalent > > and 3.567 quoted by Charles should be the amount of CO2eq, counting the > emissions during extracting oil, transporing oil, making kerosen, and so on > _______________________________________________ > Greenhouse Gas Inventory Experts Network > www.ghgnetwork.org > > To post message: > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at ghgnetwork.org > > To unsubscribe: > http://milkyway.forumone.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss ****************@******************* Richard Heede Climate Mitigation Services 1626 Gateway Road Snowmass, CO 81654-9214 USA 1-970-927-9511 office 1-970-343-0707 mobile < < < From discuss-owner at ghgnetwork.org Thu Nov 1 11:41:04 2007 From: discuss-owner at ghgnetwork.org (Michael Gillenwater [moderator]) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 11:41:04 -0400 Subject: [GHG Network] Identifying information Message-ID: <20dd85730711010841g6e8e4114h53779843e5b3ab7e@mail.gmail.com> Network Participants, I just wanted to remind everyone to please provide identifying information on yourself at the bottom of your messages submitted to the Network's email list so that everyone knows who you are. thanks, michael [moderator] -- Michael Gillenwater Executive Director GHG Inventory Experts Network www.ghgnetwork.org -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071101/5d5f2c1c/attachment.html From discuss-owner at ghgnetwork.org Thu Nov 1 15:14:56 2007 From: discuss-owner at ghgnetwork.org (Michael Gillenwater [moderator]) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 12:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [GHG Network] News Release: Official Launch of the Offset Quality Initiative Message-ID: <411446.23079.qm@web38908.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Network Participants, I am proud to announce the formation of the Offset Quality Initiative (OQI). The GHG Experts Network is a founding member of OQI. OQI develops consensus statements on issues related to GHG emission offsets. The GHG Experts Network will represent itself as an independent organization as part of the OQI. Given the diversity of participants in the Network, clearly we may not represent your views or that of a majority of participants in the Network. However, the staff of the Network may ask you as a participant to provide your opinion on important issues being addressed by OQI in the future. Please see the press release below for more information. Michael Gillenwater [moderator] Michael Gillenwater GHG Experts Network (Executive Director) gillenwater at ghgnetwork.org Offset Quality Initiative News Release New Partnership Promotes Integration of High Quality Greenhouse Gas Offsets into Climate Policy Contact: Alexia Kelly, Policy Analyst, The Climate Trust, (503) 238-1915 ext. 208 Tom Steinfeldt, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, (703) 516-0638 Nov. 1, 2007 Portland, OR and Washington , D.C. - Six non-profit leaders in greenhouse gas reduction policy have announced the formation of the Offset Quality Initiative (OQI). The OQI will promote a policy agenda focused on the effective incorporation of high quality greenhouse gas offsets and other reduction mechanisms into emerging climate change policy. "The Offset Quality Initiative brings together many of the non-governmental community's top experts in the carbon market," said Mike Burnett, Executive Director of The Climate Trust. "Providing a forum for these leading thinkers will support policy makers as they consider the integration of greenhouse gas offsets into emerging climate change policy." The partnership is a collaborative and consensus-based voluntary effort that brings together the collective experience, resources, and expertise of its member organizations: The Climate Trust, California Climate Action Registry, Environmental Resources Trust, Greenhouse Gas Experts Network, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, and The Climate Group. The objectives of the OQI are: To develop and promote consensus policy positions for the optimal integration and treatment of greenhouse gas offsets in current and future state, regional and national climate change policy. To educate stakeholders on the opportunities and challenges presented by the integration of greenhouse gas offsets into regulatory and voluntary climate change mitigation strategies. To serve as a source of credible information on greenhouse gas offsets based on the diverse collective knowledge and experience of the Offset Quality Initiative members. To promote innovation in the greenhouse gas offset market and to provide guidance on best practices and policies. "As policy makers begin to design future climate legislation it will be important to have an authoritative source of information regarding effective, high quality greenhouse gas offsets," said Janet Peace, Senior Research Fellow at the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. "The Pew Center is pleased to be a founding member of this important effort." Topics the group plans to address include: key criteria of high quality greenhouse gas offsets, the interaction of voluntary and regulatory greenhouse gas reduction markets, opportunities and challenges presented by various offset project types, and recommended roles for offsets in emerging climate change policy. ### Offset Quality Initiative Members: The Climate Trust Greenhouse Gas Experts Network California Climate Action Registry Pew Center on Global Climate Change Environmental Resources Trust The Climate Group -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071101/f12b18c9/attachment.html From Todd.Haurin at m-e.aecom.com Thu Nov 1 12:22:49 2007 From: Todd.Haurin at m-e.aecom.com (Haurin, Todd) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 09:22:49 -0700 Subject: [GHG Network] CO2 emissions from oxy-acetylene welding Message-ID: <10B3D1C54588E64F9E58A55EF4CA6C046FB75A@usla1ex007.na.aecomnet.com> I've been asked by several people about this so I have sent this out to everyone: Oxy-acetylene used for welding and/or metal cutting Molecular formula: C2H2 The following equation is the resulting CO2 emissions for the complete combustion of a 92 cubic foot cylinder of acetylene. Assumption: The cylinder is under pressure ~ 250 pounds per square inch gauge (psig) Todd Haurin Project Scientist Metcalf & Eddy|AECOM 5075 Bradley Rd., Ste. 203 Santa Maria, CA 93455 805-938-8381 Office 805-450-4349 Mobile 805-938-0047 Fax todd.haurin at m-e.aecom.com www.aecom.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071101/8ec69862/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/octet-stream Size: 828 bytes Desc: oledata.mso Url : http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071101/8ec69862/attachment.obj -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/x-ms-wmz Size: 811 bytes Desc: image001.wmz Url : http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071101/8ec69862/attachment.bin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 1771 bytes Desc: image002.gif Url : http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071101/8ec69862/attachment.gif From environmental_ss at yahoo.com Thu Nov 1 13:22:16 2007 From: environmental_ss at yahoo.com (Environmental Support Service) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [GHG Network] "Climate Change: Preparing Nigeria to Face Emerging Challenges" Message-ID: <270913.67068.qm@web52201.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Dear all, I am coming up with the above mentioned events in Nigeria, I am looking forward to organization and Individual that can make technical donation NO FUND OR CASH but materials that can assist in carrying out the events successfully More about the events: "Climate Change: Preparing Nigeria to Face Emerging Challenges" The Climate Change Global Campaign in Lagos State: Preparing Nigeria to face Emerging Challenges will be held in December 8th, 2007. It will witness a participation of over 500 people comprising of politicians, bureaucrats, business executives, development workers, renowned editors and concerned media luminaries, Motivational Agencies, activists, doctors, lawyers, teachers, students, youth leaders, children along with over many eminent thought leaders will all gathered there to discuss social issues and understand the need for Nigeria to come together as ONE and pledged to try and RIGHT every WRONG. Thank you ADEWOLE TAIWO(B.sc,M.sc) Close 12 House 10 Satellite Town, Lagos State, Nigeria. TEL:- +234 802 335 4679, +234 1 470 3591 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071101/575f9781/attachment-0001.html From madelucchi at ucdavis.edu Thu Nov 1 15:25:15 2007 From: madelucchi at ucdavis.edu (Mark A. Delucchi) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 12:25:15 -0700 Subject: [GHG Network] Aircraft Jet Kerosene emissions factors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Rick, The closest fuels I have done LCAs for are gasoline and diesel, and for them 12.2% is far, far too low. Mark Delucchi Research Scientist Institute of Transportation Studies University of California Davis, CA 95616 www.its.ucdavis.edu/people/faculty/delucchi madelucchi at ucdavis.edu On Nov 1, 2007, at 7:29 AM, Rick Heede wrote: > I don't have a wells-to-turbine emissions analysis for kerosene at > hand, but > I doubt that 12.2 percent (3.567 / 3.18) adder to combustion is > likely to > account for the full extent of CO2 and CH4 emissions of oil > production, > field energy use, transport, refining, and delivery of Jet-A fuel. > If anyone > has a supply chain emissions estimate for kerosene, let us know. > Cheers, -Rick-= > > On 10/31/07 5:05 AM, "Marc Aristegui" wrote: > >> I agree with Keith and Duncan. >> >> 0.853 is carbon equivalent per ton of kerosene >> 0.853 * 44/12 = 3.18 is carbon dioxide equivalent >> >> and 3.567 quoted by Charles should be the amount of CO2eq, >> counting the >> emissions during extracting oil, transporing oil, making kerosen, >> and so on >> _______________________________________________ >> Greenhouse Gas Inventory Experts Network >> www.ghgnetwork.org >> >> To post message: >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss at ghgnetwork.org >> >> To unsubscribe: >> http://milkyway.forumone.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > ****************@******************* > Richard Heede > Climate Mitigation Services > 1626 Gateway Road > Snowmass, CO 81654-9214 USA > 1-970-927-9511 office > 1-970-343-0707 mobile > > < < < > > > > _______________________________________________ > Greenhouse Gas Inventory Experts Network > www.ghgnetwork.org > > To post message: > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at ghgnetwork.org > > To unsubscribe: > http://milkyway.forumone.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss From fasen at menara.ma Fri Nov 2 05:44:59 2007 From: fasen at menara.ma (fasen) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 09:44:59 -0000 Subject: [GHG Network] RE : CO2 sequestrated by jatropha plantations. Message-ID: -----Message d'origine----- De : fasen [mailto:fasen at menara.ma] Envoy? : vendredi 26 octobre 2007 00:38 ? : 'Michael Gillenwater [moderator]'; 'discuss at ghgnetwork.org' Objet : CO2 sequestrated by jatropha plantations. Dear colleagues, Does anyone have a reference for a methodology to calculate an estimate of the CO2 sequestred by a jatropha plantation ? Thanks with all the best, faouzi senhaji GERERE Rabat Morocco fasen at menara.ma -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071102/9d6b1cd3/attachment.html From Sonia.Petrie at mfe.govt.nz Thu Nov 1 21:14:23 2007 From: Sonia.Petrie at mfe.govt.nz (Sonia Petrie) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:14:23 +1300 Subject: [GHG Network] method for calculating emissions from cable manufacture using a nitrogen cure process Message-ID: <42414C06D015C947993F641F06174CB40A25745B@somes.mfe.mfe.govt.nz> Dear Colleagues We have recently been made aware of a company in New Zealand intending to use a nitrogen cure process for power cable manufacturing. The company has told us this process produces N2O emissions but not much more than that. Does anyone know much about this process, whether it produces N2O emissions and if so where a methodology and emission factor information could be found? I look forward to your responses. kind regards, Sonia Petrie Sonia Petrie National Inventory Compiler - New Zealand Reporting and Communications Ministry for the Environment - Manat? M? Te Taiao PO Box 10362, Wellington, New Zealand DDI +64-4-439 7498 www.mfe.govt.nz -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071102/41334285/attachment.html From erik.van.agtmaal at altimedes.com Fri Nov 2 13:30:51 2007 From: erik.van.agtmaal at altimedes.com (Erik van Agtmaal) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 18:30:51 +0100 Subject: [GHG Network] ERE per country Message-ID: <001e01c81d76$1dd2a670$6401a8c0@lasef991605f5a> Dear all, I am looking for the ERE or energy requirement for energy value per energy carrier used or potentially used in transport activities and per country or area. We are developing a generic tool to measure the energy consumption and greenhouse gas and other emissions of supply chains per unit product (value, weight, .). This tool will be used to help companies (shippers as well as transport companies) to develop more sustainable supply chains and to measure the effect of alternative solutions and improvements in a accurate, consistent and transparent way. We use data from existing databases but it is the intention to go to a bottom up direct input from transport companies in a second phase. Part of this tool is to add the energy losses during the energy conversion chain. This is needed to evaluate the potential effect of alternative energy carriers since (fossil) energy is needed to produce it. This will be specific per country or area as the distance between "well and wheels" will be different as well as the energy sources for the production of electricity. Does a central database exist with this information or can you advise me how to find this information. Erik van Agtmaal Managing Partner Green Logistics Consultants Group Langeweide 2 1730 Asse Belgium Phone: +32(0)2 460 17 30 Fax: +32(0)2 460 57 20 Mobile: +32(0)476 34 51 17 E-mail: erik.van.agtmaal at altimedes.com Website: www.greenlogisticsconsultants.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071102/6f7333f5/attachment.html From noel at ram.net.au Sat Nov 3 05:20:37 2007 From: noel at ram.net.au (Fiona Ryan) Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 19:20:37 +1000 Subject: [GHG Network] Biome specific fores definitions Message-ID: <472C3D65.30003@ram.net.au> Hi all Does anyone know what happened to this biome specific definition mentioned in the Marrakech accords and why it never went anywhere. Regards Fiona (b) To investigate the possible application of biome-specific forest definitions for the second and subsequent commitment periods with a view to the Conference of the Parties at its tenth session recommending a decision for adoption on the use of such biome-specific forest definitions for future commitment periods to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its first session; From Jens.Borken at dlr.de Sat Nov 3 12:28:55 2007 From: Jens.Borken at dlr.de (Jens.Borken at dlr.de) Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 17:28:55 +0100 Subject: [GHG Network] ERE per country References: <001e01c81d76$1dd2a670$6401a8c0@lasef991605f5a> Message-ID: Dear Erik, you can find a tool for comparing energy consumption and emissions for transportation by various modes for Europe under http://www.ecotransit.org/137.html The associatted documentation provides also the data you are looking for specifically. Regards Jens Dr.Jens Borken DLR - Verkehrsforschung Rutherfordstr.2 12489 Berlin Tel.: +49-30-67055-238 Fax : +49-30-67055-202 Jens.Borken at dlr.de -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: discuss-bounces at ghgnetwork.org im Auftrag von Erik van Agtmaal Gesendet: Fr 02.11.2007 18:30 An: discuss at ghgnetwork.org Betreff: [GHG Network] ERE per country Dear all, I am looking for the ERE or energy requirement for energy value per energy carrier used or potentially used in transport activities and per country or area. We are developing a generic tool to measure the energy consumption and greenhouse gas and other emissions of supply chains per unit product (value, weight, .). This tool will be used to help companies (shippers as well as transport companies) to develop more sustainable supply chains and to measure the effect of alternative solutions and improvements in a accurate, consistent and transparent way. We use data from existing databases but it is the intention to go to a bottom up direct input from transport companies in a second phase. Part of this tool is to add the energy losses during the energy conversion chain. This is needed to evaluate the potential effect of alternative energy carriers since (fossil) energy is needed to produce it. This will be specific per country or area as the distance between "well and wheels" will be different as well as the energy sources for the production of electricity. Does a central database exist with this information or can you advise me how to find this information. Erik van Agtmaal Managing Partner Green Logistics Consultants Group Langeweide 2 1730 Asse Belgium Phone: +32(0)2 460 17 30 Fax: +32(0)2 460 57 20 Mobile: +32(0)476 34 51 17 E-mail: erik.van.agtmaal at altimedes.com Website: www.greenlogisticsconsultants.com From bernhard.schlamadinger at terracarbon.com Sun Nov 4 09:03:35 2007 From: bernhard.schlamadinger at terracarbon.com (Bernhard Schlamadinger) Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:03:35 +0100 Subject: [GHG Network] Biome specific fores definitions Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20071104150209.02062728@terracarbon.com> Dear Fiona, part of the reason might be explained in this document: http://unfccc.int/documentation/documents/items/3595.php?rec=j&priref=600001847&data=t_&volltext=2002&anf=0&sorted=date_sort&dirc=DESC&seite= Best regards, Bernhard At 10:20 03.11.2007, Fiona Ryan wrote: >Hi all > >Does anyone know what happened to this biome specific definition >mentioned in the Marrakech accords and why it never went anywhere. > >Regards >Fiona > > >(b) To investigate the possible application of biome-specific forest >definitions for > >the second and subsequent commitment periods with a view to the >Conference of the Parties at its tenth session recommending a decision >for adoption on the use of such biome-specific forest definitions for >future commitment periods to the Conference of the Parties serving as >the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its first session; > >_______________________________________________ >Greenhouse Gas Inventory Experts Network >www.ghgnetwork.org > >To post message: >Discuss mailing list >Discuss at ghgnetwork.org > >To unsubscribe: >http://milkyway.forumone.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss From jking at mwcog.org Tue Nov 6 13:18:43 2007 From: jking at mwcog.org (Jeffrey King) Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 13:18:43 -0500 Subject: [GHG Network] Consumer Product Method? Message-ID: Hi. I am still working on the draft GHG inventory for the Washington DC region. Is anyone aware of a method/activity data/emission factor that could be used to develop an assessment of CO2 emission that could be "attributed" to consumption of consumer products? We certainly don't have the time to do a life cycle assessment for each product sold in the region, but clearly some (most) of the products the region consumes cause (either directly or indirectly) GHG emissions in their production and distribution. If anyone can refer me to a simplified approach for such a calculation, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. Jeff Jeff King Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Washington, DC 20002 jking at mwcog.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071106/41e7d31d/attachment.html From Charles.Russell at gcal.ac.uk Wed Nov 7 04:54:02 2007 From: Charles.Russell at gcal.ac.uk (Russell, Charles) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 09:54:02 -0000 Subject: [GHG Network] Consumer Product Method? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hi Jeff I think it's a complex issue and certainly it is something we have been looking at in the UK. The Carbon Trust has commissioned research on the issue and from a Carbon inventory approach the report below is useful. There is also a lot of work going on in the UK at the moment investigating supply chain associated CO2 emissions and I have recently seen an interesting model from Envirowise (AEA) - that includes "materials carbon footprint" in business overall carbon footprint. If you would like further information on that let me know and I'll send on a contact name. http://www.carbontrust.co.uk/Publications/publicationdetail.htm?producti d=CTC603&metaNoCache=1 You may also want to consult with the Stockholm Environment Institute who have developed a tool called REAP. This is a powerful tool that works on consumption and production flow and although I haven't used it directly myself, I know that colleagues from SEI are contributors to this site, perhaps there might be some further discussion. My contact here in the UK is Dr John Barrett who is based at York University. The REAP tool is being used by local government and also provides policy indicators for assisting with policy formulation. Hope that helps. Kind regards Charlie Russell Dr Charles Russell Caledonian Environment Centre Buchanan House Glasgow Caledonian University Cowcaddens Road Glasgow G4 0BA Tel: 0141 331 8427 Fax: 0141 273 1430 Email:Charles.Russell at gcal.ac.uk Web:www.gcal.ac.uk/environment ________________________________ From: discuss-bounces at ghgnetwork.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at ghgnetwork.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey King Sent: 06 November 2007 18:19 To: discuss at ghgnetwork.org Subject: [GHG Network] Consumer Product Method? Hi. I am still working on the draft GHG inventory for the Washington DC region. Is anyone aware of a method/activity data/emission factor that could be used to develop an assessment of CO2 emission that could be "attributed" to consumption of consumer products? We certainly don't have the time to do a life cycle assessment for each product sold in the region, but clearly some (most) of the products the region consumes cause (either directly or indirectly) GHG emissions in their production and distribution. If anyone can refer me to a simplified approach for such a calculation, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. Jeff Jeff King Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Washington, DC 20002 jking at mwcog.org Email has been scanned for viruses by Altman Technologies' email management service -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071107/5c5a0d2b/attachment-0001.html From DRich at wri.org Wed Nov 7 11:21:20 2007 From: DRich at wri.org (David Rich) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:21:20 -0500 Subject: [GHG Network] GHG Protocol Survey on Life Cycle & Supply Chain GHG Accounting Message-ID: <46E2E1971BCEC1459149FBB1A4B4342CC2700E@wricsex029330.WRI.CRM.Local> GHG Network members: The WRI/WBCSD Greenhouse Gas Protocol standards have become recognized as internationally accepted best practice in GHG reporting at the corporate and project levels. Since the publication of our standards, the program has been engaged in refining our tools and methods, developing supportive guidelines, as well as engaging in capacity building and standard harmonization activities. Recently, the program has received a significant number of inquiries which have led us to consider the need for the development of a new suite of international standards or guidelines related to life cycle/supply chain emissions accounting for products and/or organizations. We have developed a survey to help us assess the need for further standards/guidance. We hope to use the results from this survey to enable us to gain additional insight and feedback and make an appropriate decision on next steps. The survey is being sent to approximately 300 stakeholders, experts and companies. You are all welcome to participate and we hope you have a moment to fill out the attached survey. We appreciate detailed responses, but even short responses will be helpful. Please send the completed survey to drich at wri.org by November 23, 2007. All submitted surveys will remain anonymous and general results will be circulated for information. We plan to complete this consultation process, analyze the results, and decide on next steps by January-February 2008. We appreciate your participation and please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions. WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol Team ___________________ David Rich Climate & Energy Program World Resources Institute 10 G Street NE, Suite 800 Washington DC, 20002 (202) 729-7744 drich at wri.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071107/88eb5141/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: GHG Protocol Life Cycle & Supply Chain Questionnaire.doc Type: application/msword Size: 51200 bytes Desc: GHG Protocol Life Cycle & Supply Chain Questionnaire.doc Url : http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071107/88eb5141/attachment-0001.doc From Ian.Turney at frst.govt.nz Wed Nov 7 14:46:41 2007 From: Ian.Turney at frst.govt.nz (Ian Turney) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 08:46:41 +1300 Subject: [GHG Network] Consumer Product Method? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <275795DAB3380C4F92E63BAB2196AF8C5FBED5@hermes.frst.int> There are a number of sites starting to look at this issue in various ways, a new site worth looking at is ShipGreen(tm) is an eco-friendly shipping program that easily integrates into your existing online shopping cart. With just a single click, customers who buy products from you can use ShipGreen(tm) to offset the CO2 created by shipping their order. It takes less than 5 minutes for you to get started. The emission factors for shipping have been developed by UC Berkeley, Cristiano Facanha, Ph.D., and Arpad Horvath, Ph.D., Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley. http://www.shipgreen.net/ Ian Turney, MBA Strategy Investment Manager - Environment, Foundation for Research, Science and Technology, Level 8 PWC Building, 119 Armagh Street, PO Box 25029, Christchurch, New Zealand. Ph +64 3 963 2074, Fax +64 3 963 2071, Mob 021 670980 Web www.frst.govt.nz Email ian.turney at frst.govt.nz -----Original Message----- From: discuss-bounces at ghgnetwork.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at ghgnetwork.org] On Behalf Of Russell, Charles Sent: Wednesday, 7 November 2007 10:54 p.m. To: Jeffrey King; discuss at ghgnetwork.org Subject: Re: [GHG Network] Consumer Product Method? Hi Jeff I think it's a complex issue and certainly it is something we have been looking at in the UK. The Carbon Trust has commissioned research on the issue and from a Carbon inventory approach the report below is useful. There is also a lot of work going on in the UK at the moment investigating supply chain associated CO2 emissions and I have recently seen an interesting model from Envirowise (AEA) - that includes "materials carbon footprint" in business overall carbon footprint. If you would like further information on that let me know and I'll send on a contact name. http://www.carbontrust.co.uk/Publications/publicationdetail.htm?producti d=CTC603&metaNoCache=1 You may also want to consult with the Stockholm Environment Institute who have developed a tool called REAP. This is a powerful tool that works on consumption and production flow and although I haven't used it directly myself, I know that colleagues from SEI are contributors to this site, perhaps there might be some further discussion. My contact here in the UK is Dr John Barrett who is based at York University. The REAP tool is being used by local government and also provides policy indicators for assisting with policy formulation. Hope that helps. Kind regards Charlie Russell Dr Charles Russell Caledonian Environment Centre Buchanan House Glasgow Caledonian University Cowcaddens Road Glasgow G4 0BA Tel: 0141 331 8427 Fax: 0141 273 1430 Email:Charles.Russell at gcal.ac.uk Web:www.gcal.ac.uk/environment ________________________________ From: discuss-bounces at ghgnetwork.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at ghgnetwork.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey King Sent: 06 November 2007 18:19 To: discuss at ghgnetwork.org Subject: [GHG Network] Consumer Product Method? Hi. I am still working on the draft GHG inventory for the Washington DC region. Is anyone aware of a method/activity data/emission factor that could be used to develop an assessment of CO2 emission that could be "attributed" to consumption of consumer products? We certainly don't have the time to do a life cycle assessment for each product sold in the region, but clearly some (most) of the products the region consumes cause (either directly or indirectly) GHG emissions in their production and distribution. If anyone can refer me to a simplified approach for such a calculation, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. Jeff Jeff King Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Washington, DC 20002 jking at mwcog.org Email has been scanned for viruses by Altman Technologies' email management service -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071108/2248b712/attachment.html From d.noble at fivewinds.com Thu Nov 8 11:40:47 2007 From: d.noble at fivewinds.com (Duncan Noble) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:40:47 -0500 Subject: [GHG Network] Consumer Product Method? References: <39EF5275166C43DBA9E03DE7C040ECD6@fw.local> Message-ID: <01CE0D85287E7A42968FB5C46568C640066D75@fwserver.fw.local> I assume that the UK Carbon Trust report cited below uses an "economic input output LCA" approach, which looks at macroeconomic data and emissions data to create a model of the GHG emissions intensity of various sectors of the economy. There are many caveats to using this approach (e.g., focuses on production of products only, it is a linear approach so that producing a $40,000 car has twice the impact of a $20,000 car, etc.). Notwithstanding those and other caveats, there is a publicly available version for the U.S. economy at http://www.eiolca.net/ (this is a Carnegie Mellon University initiative). It may be useful to give you a very rough approximation of what you are looking for; at least to compare products to other elements of your inventory. Cheers ... Duncan Duncan Noble Five Winds International - Value without Burden - _______________________________________________ www.fivewinds.com Ottawa, Canada Tel: +1.613.722.6629 ext. 224 Five Winds is a Carbon Neutral Company and follows a Sustainable Purchasing Policy ________________________________ From: discuss-bounces at ghgnetwork.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at ghgnetwork.org] On Behalf Of Ian Turney Sent: November 7, 2007 7:46 PM To: Russell, Charles; Jeffrey King; discuss at ghgnetwork.org Subject: Re: [GHG Network] Consumer Product Method? There are a number of sites starting to look at this issue in various ways, a new site worth looking at is ShipGreen(tm) is an eco-friendly shipping program that easily integrates into your existing online shopping cart. With just a single click, customers who buy products from you can use ShipGreen(tm) to offset the CO2 created by shipping their order. It takes less than 5 minutes for you to get started. The emission factors for shipping have been developed by UC Berkeley, Cristiano Facanha, Ph.D., and Arpad Horvath, Ph.D., Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley. http://www.shipgreen.net/ Ian Turney, MBA Strategy Investment Manager - Environment, Foundation for Research, Science and Technology, Level 8 PWC Building, 119 Armagh Street, PO Box 25029, Christchurch, New Zealand. Ph +64 3 963 2074, Fax +64 3 963 2071, Mob 021 670980 Web www.frst.govt.nz Email ian.turney at frst.govt.nz -----Original Message----- From: discuss-bounces at ghgnetwork.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at ghgnetwork.org] On Behalf Of Russell, Charles Sent: Wednesday, 7 November 2007 10:54 p.m. To: Jeffrey King; discuss at ghgnetwork.org Subject: Re: [GHG Network] Consumer Product Method? Hi Jeff I think it's a complex issue and certainly it is something we have been looking at in the UK. The Carbon Trust has commissioned research on the issue and from a Carbon inventory approach the report below is useful. There is also a lot of work going on in the UK at the moment investigating supply chain associated CO2 emissions and I have recently seen an interesting model from Envirowise (AEA) - that includes "materials carbon footprint" in business overall carbon footprint. If you would like further information on that let me know and I'll send on a contact name. http://www.carbontrust.co.uk/Publications/publicationdetail.htm?producti d=CTC603&metaNoCache=1 You may also want to consult with the Stockholm Environment Institute who have developed a tool called REAP. This is a powerful tool that works on consumption and production flow and although I haven't used it directly myself, I know that colleagues from SEI are contributors to this site, perhaps there might be some further discussion. My contact here in the UK is Dr John Barrett who is based at York University. The REAP tool is being used by local government and also provides policy indicators for assisting with policy formulation. Hope that helps. Kind regards Charlie Russell Dr Charles Russell Caledonian Environment Centre Buchanan House Glasgow Caledonian University Cowcaddens Road Glasgow G4 0BA Tel: 0141 331 8427 Fax: 0141 273 1430 Email:Charles.Russell at gcal.ac.uk Web:www.gcal.ac.uk/environment ________________________________ From: discuss-bounces at ghgnetwork.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at ghgnetwork.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey King Sent: 06 November 2007 18:19 To: discuss at ghgnetwork.org Subject: [GHG Network] Consumer Product Method? Hi. I am still working on the draft GHG inventory for the Washington DC region. Is anyone aware of a method/activity data/emission factor that could be used to develop an assessment of CO2 emission that could be "attributed" to consumption of consumer products? We certainly don't have the time to do a life cycle assessment for each product sold in the region, but clearly some (most) of the products the region consumes cause (either directly or indirectly) GHG emissions in their production and distribution. If anyone can refer me to a simplified approach for such a calculation, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. Jeff Jeff King Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Washington, DC 20002 jking at mwcog.org Email has been scanned for viruses by Altman Technologies' email management service -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071108/0d39aebd/attachment.html From credcsecretariat at yahoo.com Mon Nov 12 06:20:37 2007 From: credcsecretariat at yahoo.com (Etiosa CREDC) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 03:20:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: [GHG Network] Conference on Promoting Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency in Nigeria Message-ID: <63424.78140.qm@web32814.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Dear All, We are pleased to invite you to a one-day conference on ?Promoting Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency in Nigeria?. The one-day event will hold as follows: Venue: University of Calabar Hotel and Conference Centre, Plot D6 Akim Layout, Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria Date: Wednesday 21st November, 2007 Time: 10 am The objectives of the conference are to create awareness on renewable energy and energy efficiency in Nigeria; and to enhance stakeholders? capacity to advocate for renewable energy and energy efficiency. The programme will also enhance the participation of stakeholders in the on-going global climate change debate. It will facilitate the creation of a network of renewable energy and energy efficiency advocates that will pioneer the development of renewable energy and energy efficiency in Nigeria. The conference is being organized by the Community Research and Development Centre (CREDC) with support from the Global Greengrants Fund and the Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria. CREDC is a non-governmental, non-profit, research and development-base organization committed to the sustainable management of the environment and environmental resources. Details about CREDC can be found in our website www.credcentre.org Registration for the conference is free. Participants are however expected to transport themselves to the conference venue and cater for their accommodation. Our funding only covers limited representatives of local NGOs and CBOs which the conference team has notified already. Further enquiry on the forum can be directed to the conference team via info at credcentre.org or credscretariat at yahoo.com We look forward to seeing you. Sincerely, Etiosa Uyigue Etiosa Uyigue, M. Sc. Executive Director, Community Research and Development Centre (CREDC) Office Adress: 90 Uselu-Lagos Raod, Opposite Zenith Bank, P.O. Box 11011, Benin 300001,Edo State, Nigeria Tel: 234 802 897 8877; 07039405619 Efax: 1 309 401 0921; Emails: info at credcentre.org; credcsecretariat at yahoo.com Website: www.credcentre.org __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071112/e3907878/attachment.html From adrian.mueller at soi.uzh.ch Wed Nov 14 04:56:12 2007 From: adrian.mueller at soi.uzh.ch (Adrian Muller) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:56:12 -0500 (EST) Subject: [GHG Network] project-based CO2 abatement costs Message-ID: <20071114095612.4778CC1849D@milkyway.forumone.com> Hi, I am looking for data on costs of single (i.e. firm- or project-wise) CO2-abatement measures and also on sector-wise CO2 MAC curves (both mainly for industrialized countries. esp. Europe; i.e. no CDM - but information on CDM costs is also appreciated). Thanks and best regards, Adrian Muller. From anil.raut at gmail.com Wed Nov 14 10:32:44 2007 From: anil.raut at gmail.com (Anil K. Raut) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:32:44 +0900 Subject: [GHG Network] New carbon budget analysis and PPT References: <20071114095612.4778CC1849D@milkyway.forumone.com> Message-ID: <072c01c826d3$9ced4710$9a66a8c0@ANILRAUT> Dear All, The Global Carbon Project has just published a new analysis of the state of the carbon cycle and its immediate drivers of perturbation (economic growth, carbon intensity of the global economy, and natural CO2 sinks on land and oceans). You can download the paper and a ppt file with i) additional carbon trends, and ii) the global carbon budget to 2006 from: http://www.globalcarbonproject.org/activities/AcceleratingAtmosphericCO2.htm Best regards, Anil ---------------- Anil K. Raut Assistant Fellow Global Carbon Project - Tsukuba International Office c/o National Institute for Environmental Studies 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Japan 305 8506 Tel: +81 29 850 2672, Fax: +81 29 850 2960 E-mail: anil.raut[AT]nies.go.jp Urban and Regional Carbon Management: www.gcp-urcm.org Global Carbon project: www.globalcarbonproject.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071115/62738fcc/attachment-0001.html From TFransen at wri.org Thu Nov 22 14:35:51 2007 From: TFransen at wri.org (Taryn Fransen) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:35:51 -0500 Subject: [GHG Network] World Resources Institute hiring for GHG Protocol team Message-ID: <46E2E1971BCEC1459149FBB1A4B4342CD4D9C9@wricsex029330.WRI.CRM.Local> The World Resources Institute is seeking a Research Analyst to join its GHG Protocol team based in Washington, DC. Please apply by December 7 per the instructions in the attached job description, directing application materials to Ms. Angel Hsu at ahsu at wri.org. (Disregard the out-of-office response; your application will be received.) Taryn Fransen Senior Associate, Climate & Energy Program World Resources Institute 10 G St. NE, 8th Floor Washington, DC 20002 +1 (202) 729 7790 tfransen at wri.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071122/cbd0a892/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: GHGP RA Job Description (v4).doc Type: application/msword Size: 49664 bytes Desc: GHGP RA Job Description (v4).doc Url : http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071122/cbd0a892/attachment-0001.doc From Karen.TREANTON at iea.org Fri Nov 23 09:23:42 2007 From: Karen.TREANTON at iea.org (TREANTON Karen, IEA/ESD) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:23:42 +0100 Subject: [GHG Network] Statistician position open at the International Energy Agency (OECD) Message-ID: The International Energy Agency is currently in the process of recruiting one or more statisticians to work in Paris, FRANCE. We are interested in finding candidates that have good computer programming skills. Knowledge of energy is an advantage, but not essential. Candidates do not need to know how to speak French - English is sufficient. Although we have several statisticians with PhDs, in general we are looking for people with a masters degree. Some candidates have 1-2 years of work experience, others come directly from their studies. Salary Basic starting salary: 2 800 Euros/month + allowances Role Under the general supervision of an Administrator, the main responsibilities will be to assist in the reception, review, input and checking of data submissions and to participate in the creation and maintenance of large databases of the Energy Statistics Division. Main Duties 1. Receive, review and input data submissions from Member countries and other sources. Check data for completeness, internal consistency and plausibility, and correct calculations using existing verification procedures. Compare data with published sources for accuracy and consistency with definitions. 2. Assist in investigating and resolving anomalies in collaboration with national administrations of Member countries. 3. Maintain appropriate documentation on data series. 4. Participate in the creation and maintenance of large computerised databases and draft instructions for processing data. 5. Participate in the IEA Emergency Data System as required. 6. Assist in designing and implementing procedures for the preparation of the energy statistics publications using the main databases and software available on the PC local area network. Exploit hardware and software developments to improve the efficiency of working methods. 7. Carry out ad hoc extractions and manipulation of data. 8. Carry out other related duties as assigned. Principal Qualifications 1. Sound knowledge of elementary mathematics. Some knowledge of energy industry operations and terminology would be an advantage. 2. Experience in the basic use of databases and computer software. Good computer programming skills. 3. Ability to work accurately, pay attention to detail and work to deadlines. Ability to deal simultaneously with a wide variety of tasks and to organise work efficiently. 4. Good communication skills; ability to work well in a team and in a multicultural environment, particularly in liaising with contacts in national administrations and industry. 5. Very good knowledge of one of the two official languages of the Organisation (English or French). Knowledge of other languages would be an advantage. Note: Applicants must be successful on the IEA or OECD test for Statisticians. Candidates must be from an OECD country: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. An initial contract of three months will be given with the possibility of a subsequent three-year contract. Send curriculum vitae to: karen.treanton at iea.org For more information, please see our website at http://www.iea.org From credcsecretariat at yahoo.com Tue Nov 27 11:09:27 2007 From: credcsecretariat at yahoo.com (Etiosa CREDC) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:09:27 -0800 (PST) Subject: [GHG Network] Summary Report on the Conference on Promoting Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency in Nigeria Message-ID: <19822.22105.qm@web32802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Dear All, Please find attached the summary of the proceedings of the conference titled ?Promoting Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency in Nigeria? which held on the 21 November, 2007 at the University of Calabar Hotel and Conference Centre, Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. Also attached is the communiqu? issued at the conference. The full report of the conference will be out in few weeks. The conference was organized by the Community Research and Development Centre (CREDC) with support from the Global Greengrants Fund and the Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria. Information about CREDC can be found in www.credcentre.org Please send questions and comments to credcsectretariat at yahoo.com Regards, Etiosa Uyigue Etiosa Uyigue, M. Sc. Executive Director, Community Research and Development Centre (CREDC) Office Adress: 90 Uselu-Lagos Raod, Opposite Zenith Bank, P.O. Box 11011, Benin 300001,Edo State, Nigeria Tel: 234 802 897 8877; 07039405619 Efax: 1 309 401 0921; Emails: info at credcentre.org; credcsecretariat at yahoo.com Website: www.credcentre.org --------------------------------- Be a better pen pal. Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071127/630db806/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Summary_Calabar_Conference_Nigeria.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 397158 bytes Desc: 123962665-Summary_Calabar_Conference_Nigeria.pdf Url : http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071127/630db806/attachment-0002.pdf -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Communiqu?_Calabar_Conference.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 64173 bytes Desc: 3708758424-Communiqu?_Calabar_Conference.pdf Url : http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071127/630db806/attachment-0003.pdf From Stanford.Mwakasonda at uct.ac.za Wed Nov 28 09:00:58 2007 From: Stanford.Mwakasonda at uct.ac.za (Stanford Mwakasonda) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:00:58 +0200 Subject: [GHG Network] Gel fuel emissions Message-ID: <474D90B9.9352.00E2.0@uct.ac.za> Dear colleagues, I am trying to do a GHG emission comparison between use of kerosene (paraffin) and gel fuel. I need to compute emissions arising from use of gel fuel. Being a biofuel, I understand I need to take into consideration some aspects of the gel fuel Life Cycle Analysis (LCA), as it can not be said to be a zero net emission fuel. Does anyone know what emission factors I could use? Are there standard energy content figures for gel fuel? I would appreciate hearing from you. Best regards, Stanford ///////////\\\\\\\\\\\\///////////////\\\\ Stanford Mwakasonda Energy Research Centre (ERC) University of Cape Town P/Bag, Rondebosch, 7701 South Africa Tel: +27-21-650 2521 Fax: +27-21-650 2830 Cell: +27-7220 37352 Web: www.erc.uct.ac.za Email 2: stanford at sedec.org From scentr at ecoweb.co.zw Thu Nov 29 02:22:35 2007 From: scentr at ecoweb.co.zw (N. Nziramasanga) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:22:35 +0200 Subject: [GHG Network] Gel fuel emissions References: <474D90B9.9352.00E2.0@uct.ac.za> Message-ID: <008401c83258$aa714540$6e1fdc29@acercab9eea47c> Stanford, I think gel fuel is made from ethanol and cellulose gel. I don't have an idea on the ratios. You would have to account for emissions in the ethanol production process as well as the cellulose gel process. Depending on who is making the fuel, the ethanol in the region is mostly sugar based with bagasse and coal as the main eneryg sources. Norbert Nziramasanga Director Southern Centre for Energy and Environment 2 S Fundai House, Harare 70 4th St, Harare Zimbabwe Tel: 263 4 795242 or 263 4 795243 Mobile 263 91 422 668 Say you caught it on the net! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stanford Mwakasonda" To: Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:00 PM Subject: [GHG Network] Gel fuel emissions > Dear colleagues, > > I am trying to do a GHG emission comparison between use of kerosene > (paraffin) and gel fuel. I need to compute emissions arising from use of > gel fuel. Being a biofuel, I understand I need to take into consideration > some aspects of the gel fuel Life Cycle Analysis (LCA), as it can not be > said to be a zero net emission fuel. > > Does anyone know what emission factors I could use? Are there standard > energy content figures for gel fuel? > > I would appreciate hearing from you. > > Best regards, > > Stanford > > > ///////////\\\\\\\\\\\\///////////////\\\\ > Stanford Mwakasonda > Energy Research Centre (ERC) > University of Cape Town > P/Bag, Rondebosch, 7701 > South Africa > > Tel: +27-21-650 2521 > Fax: +27-21-650 2830 > Cell: +27-7220 37352 > Web: www.erc.uct.ac.za > Email 2: stanford at sedec.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Greenhouse Gas Inventory Experts Network > www.ghgnetwork.org > > To post message: > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at ghgnetwork.org > > To unsubscribe: > http://milkyway.forumone.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.6/1150 - Release Date: > 24/11/2007 05:58 PM > >