<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3354" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hi David</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I suggest you take a look at the UK national forest
carbon modelling (C Flow) and the following papers. a tier 3 IPCC
methodology is used by the UK to estimate forest carbon</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Cannell, M. G. R. and Dewar, R. C. (1995). The
Carbon Sink Provided by Plantation Forests and Their Products in Britain.
Forestry, 68, 35-48.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>
<P align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>Cannell, M. G. R., Milne, R., Hargreaves,
K. J., et al. (1999). National inventories of terrestrial carbon sources and
sinks: The UK experience. Climatic Change, 42, 505-530.</FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>Dewar, R. C. and Cannell, M. G. R. (1992).
Carbon Sequestration in the Trees, Products and Soils of Forest Plantations - an
Analysis Using UK Examples. Tree Physiology, 11, 49-71.</FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>Milne, R. and Brown, T. A. (1997). Carbon
in the vegetation and soils of Great Britain. Journal of Environmental
Management, 49, 413-433.</FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>Milne, R. and Brown, T. A. W. (1999).
Methods and data for Land Use Change and Forestry Sector in the 1997 IPCC
Greenhouse Gas Inventory. In: Carbon Sequestration in Vegetation and Soils (ed
Milne, R.).</FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>you can download the <FONT face=Arial
size=2>Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks due to LandUse, Land Use
Change and </FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2>Forestry Activities Report, April 2006
from the DEFRA website</FONT></P>
<P align=left> </FONT><A
href="http://www.defra.gov.uk/science/Project_Data/DocumentLibrary/GA01088/GA01088_6982_ANN.pdf"><FONT
face=Arial
size=2>www.defra.gov.uk/science/Project_Data/DocumentLibrary/GA01088/GA01088_6982_ANN.pdf</FONT></A></P>
<P align=left> </P>
<P align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>best regards</FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>kimberly robertson</FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>Kimberly Robertson <BR>FORCE
Consulting<BR>444 Pukehangi Rd<BR>Rotorua<BR>New Zealand<BR>Ph +64 7 343
9559<BR>Fax +64 7 343 9557<BR>E-mail: <A
href="mailto:kimberlyrobertson@xtra.co.nz">kimberlyrobertson@xtra.co.nz</A></FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>Specialising in <BR>Forest Carbon
Accounting<BR>Greenhouse Gas and Forestry<BR>Energy from Sustainble
Resources</FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>The message contained in this E-mail is
CONFIDENTIAL and intended only for the recipient named above. If you receive
this message and attachments in error, please notify sender and destroy the
original message.</FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>Think before you print </FONT><BR><FONT
face=Arial size=2>> Message: 8<BR>> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:34:39 -0400
(EDT)<BR>> From: David Hodge <</FONT><A
href="mailto:david.hodge2@gmail.com"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>david.hodge2@gmail.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial size=2>><BR>>
Subject: [GHG Network] UK Woodland Carbon Sequestration<BR>> To: </FONT><A
href="mailto:discuss@ghgnetwork.org"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>discuss@ghgnetwork.org</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>>
Message-ID: <</FONT><A
href="mailto:20080710213439.CE382C18068@milkyway.forumone.com"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>20080710213439.CE382C18068@milkyway.forumone.com</FONT></A><FONT
face=Arial size=2>><BR>> <BR>> Hi All,<BR>> <BR>> I would greatly
appreciate if someone could assist me in estimating the max carbon that could be
sequested by one hectare of broadleaf woodland forest in the United Kingdom.
<BR>> <BR>> Currently, the only way that I am aware of how to estimate
this is to use crude IPCC Tier 1 defaults for worldwide temperate broadleaf
forests from the IPCC NGGI Guidelines. <BR>> <BR>> Kind Regards,<BR>>
David Hodge <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ------------------------------<BR>>
<BR>> Message: 9<BR>> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:28:19 -0700<BR>> From:
"Michele Grossman" <</FONT><A href="mailto:michele.grossman@gmail.com"><FONT
face=Arial size=2>michele.grossman@gmail.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>><BR>> Subject: Re: [GHG Network] compressed gases<BR>> To:
"Jason Norman" <</FONT><A href="mailto:j.norman@bitsaintelligence.com"><FONT
face=Arial size=2>j.norman@bitsaintelligence.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>><BR>> Cc: </FONT><A href="mailto:discuss@ghgnetwork.org"><FONT
face=Arial size=2>discuss@ghgnetwork.org</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=Arial
size=2>> Message-ID:<BR>> <</FONT><A
href="mailto:253716980807101228t72adc3a3t4e543021b81b19e8@mail.gmail.com"><FONT
face=Arial
size=2>253716980807101228t72adc3a3t4e543021b81b19e8@mail.gmail.com</FONT></A><FONT
face=Arial size=2>><BR>> Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"<BR>> <BR>> I've worked on verifications for beverage
companies' GHG inventories<BR>> reported to the California Climate Action
Registry, and carbon dioxide from<BR>> beverages is being accounted for by
the companies that produce the beverage.<BR>> <BR>> Michele
Grossman<BR>> </FONT><A href="mailto:michele.grossman@gmail.com"><FONT
face=Arial size=2>michele.grossman@gmail.com</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=Arial
size=2>> <BR>> <BR>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Jason Norman
<<BR>> </FONT><A href="mailto:j.norman@bitsaintelligence.com"><FONT
face=Arial size=2>j.norman@bitsaintelligence.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>> wrote:<BR>> <BR>>> It's an interesting question and I think
it touches on a much bigger area;<BR>>> the industrial gases
business.<BR>>> If you do a quick analysis of the compressed gases
business, many of the<BR>>> associated emissions are already accounted
for:<BR>>> Air separation units to produce the gases use significant
amounts of<BR>>> electricity and would normally be associated with scope 2
for the producer.<BR>>> Distribution of compressed gases will have
associated Scope 1 emissions<BR>>> from the
distributors.<BR>>><BR>>> When it comes down to use, I'm only aware
of limited examples of using the<BR>>> compressed gas for mechanical
means. It's too expensive to use cylinder gas<BR>>> for this purpose
and as mentioned before, Air and N2 aren't GHG's. I tend<BR>>> to
agree with some of the other posts: Scope 3<BR>>><BR>>> An
interesting aside relates to the scope for compressed CO2 and dry<BR>>>
ice.... it's not as straightforward since CO2 is often captured from
other<BR>>> industrial processes, purified and distributed. CO2 is
used in many areas<BR>>> but one we're all familiar with is carbonated
drinks...when you pop the can<BR>>> you effectively release the CO2 taken
from an industrial process....it's<BR>>> your emission but you didn't
generate the CO2, you just released it......<BR>>><BR>>> Should the
original process owner account for his emission or pass it on?<BR>>>
Should the industrial gas company that is profiting from the sale of
the<BR>>> captured CO2 or the beverage company that resells it in their
drink product<BR>>> have some responsibility?<BR>>><BR>>> With
the current guidelines, one could argue that it's a good way for the<BR>>>
original industrial process to avoid a Scope 1 emission<BR>>> If you
really want to push the thinking....who would actually want to own a<BR>>>
CO2 sequestration reservoir and how much leakage insurance would they
need<BR>>> for such a scope 1 emission
liability?<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> Jason Norman<BR>>> GHG
Strategy Consultant<BR>>> </FONT><A
href="http://www.bitsaintelligence.com"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>www.bitsaintelligence.com</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>> Greenhouse Gas
Inventory Experts Network<BR>>> </FONT><A
href="http://www.ghgnetwork.org"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>www.ghgnetwork.org</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=Arial
size=2>>><BR>>> To post message:<BR>>> Discuss mailing
list<BR>>> </FONT><A href="mailto:Discuss@ghgnetwork.org"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>Discuss@ghgnetwork.org</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=Arial
size=2>>><BR>>> To unsubscribe:<BR>>> </FONT><A
href="http://milkyway.forumone.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>http://milkyway.forumone.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss</FONT></A><BR><FONT
face=Arial size=2>>><BR>> -------------- next part
--------------<BR>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>> URL: </FONT><A
href="http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20080710/5574744b/attachment.html"><FONT
face=Arial
size=2>http://milkyway.forumone.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20080710/5574744b/attachment.html</FONT></A><FONT
face=Arial size=2> <BR>> <BR>> ------------------------------<BR>>
<BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> Greenhouse Gas
Inventory Experts Network<BR>> </FONT><A
href="http://www.ghgnetwork.org"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>www.ghgnetwork.org</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>> <BR>> To
post message:<BR>> Discuss mailing list<BR>> </FONT><A
href="mailto:Discuss@ghgnetwork.org"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>Discuss@ghgnetwork.org</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>>
<BR>> To unsubscribe or edit subscription settings:<BR>> </FONT><A
href="http://milkyway.forumone.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>http://milkyway.forumone.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss</FONT></A><BR><FONT
face=Arial size=2>> <BR>> <BR>> End of Discuss Digest, Vol 27, Issue
2<BR>> **************************************</FONT></P></DIV></BODY></HTML>